
Consensual, non coercive, non exploitative sexual conduct between adolescents of close age proximity – without evidence of abuse, force, or power imbalance – is NOT a crime in Kenya
By: Gachimu Githaiga – Managing Partner
Date: 9th June 2026
In a landmark decision, in HSO & 3 Others v Attorney General & 3 Others (Petition E490 of 2025) the High Court has ruled that prosecuting adolescents for consensual, non-coercive, and non-exploitative sexual conduct with peers of close age is unconstitutional.
The judgement marks a significant shift in Kenyan law, recognizing that not every adolescent sexual encounter amounts to child sexual abuse.
The Court declared Sections 8, 9 and 11 of the Sexual Offences Act, 2006, unconstitutional to the extent that those provisions apply to consensual, non coercive, non exploitative sexual conduct between adolescents of close age proximity. The judgement flows from the constitutional rights to Dignity (Article 28), Privacy (Article 31), Health (Article 43), Equality (Article 27) and the Best Interests of the Child (Article 53).
Crucially, the Court did NOT decriminalise all adolescent sexual conducts. Non consensual, coercive, exploitative, abusive, or power imbalanced acts remain fully criminal. So do sexual acts where the age gap is not “close”.
The petition arose from the experiences of two adolescent boys who were prosecuted for defilement arising from consensual relationships with peers of a close age gap. Although the charges were later withdrawn, they challenged the law to prevent other adolescents from facing criminal prosecution for consensual, close age proximity relationships.
The Court issued binding orders requiring the police to revise arrest and investigation practices, the DPP to formalize and publish prosecutorial guidelines, and relevant ministries to develop policies ensuring adolescents can access sexual and reproductive health information and services without fear of criminalization.
If your adolescent child has been arrested, charged, or is facing investigation for defilement, attempted defilement, or indecent act with a child for a sexual conduct that was consensual, non coercive, non exploitative and between adolescents of close age proximity (e.g. 15 and 16, or 16 and 17) you may immediately apply to court to stay the proceedings based on this judgment.
Reporting policies must be updated. Not every sexual activity between adolescents should trigger a criminal complaint. The law now distinguishes between peer experimentation (protected) and abusive sexual conduct (criminal).
Refrain from arresting or prosecuting adolescents who engage in consensual, non coercive, non exploitative and between adolescents of close age proximity.
Let us be absolutely clear:
• Sexual act with a child remains a serious crime.
• Coercion, force, threats, or exploitation regardless of age remain fully criminal.
• Significant age gaps (e.g., 18 year old with a 13 year old) are not protected.
• Adult child relationships (e.g., a 25 year old with a 16 year old) are not protected.
The judgment protects only peer to peer, voluntary, sexual acts where the ages are close.
At Gachimu Githaiga & Co. Advocates, we are closely monitoring the implementation of this judgment. Our team can assist with:
• Immediate relief by filing applications to stay criminal proceedings that fall within the protected category.
• Strategic advice for adolescents, families, or NGOs seeking to quash charges.
• Policy and training for schools and other institutions needing to align their practices with the Judgement.
If your child is facing charges arising from an alleged consensual peer sexual activity, obtain legal advice promptly to determine whether the protections recognized by the High Court may apply to your case. Don’t let prosecution ruin your child’s young life if he is facing charges under the Sexual Offences Act for a consensual peer sexual act, time to act is NOW.
© 2026 Gachimu Githaiga & Co. Advocates. All Rights Reserved.
